Tsar Nicholas I 1796 – 1855

Tsar Nicholas I 1796 – 1855 was Emperor of Russia.

Tsar Nicholas I was a patient of Christian Theodore Herrmann, Simon Nicolaievitch von Korsakoff, Martin Wilhelm von Mandt and Carl Bernhard von Trinius.

Tsar Nicholas I was also a student of Carl Bernhard von Trinius at the Botanical Museum in St. Petersburg.

Tsar Nicholas I authorised the homeopathic treatment of his army, having first observed such treatment of cadets at the Naval College in Oranienbaum by O F Scherring (Martin Dinges, Patients in the History of Homeopathy, (European Association for the History of Medicine and Health Publications, 2002). Page 157-159).

In 1825, Friedrich Gottlieb Landesen was appointed Privy Councillor by Tsar Nicholas I because of his medical achievements.

In 1829, Christian Theodore Herrmann conducted the first clinical trials with homeopathy on the intermittent fevers prevalent in Tulzyn in Podolia in 1830 at the direction of Tsar Nicholas I. In 1833, homeopathy was successfully sanctioned in Russia by Tsar Nicholas I.

Simon Nicolaievitch von Korsakoff invented the Korsakoff dynamiser when he was given the task of preparing Tsar Nicholas I’s homeopathic remedies for him whilst travelling

Tsar Nicholas came across homeopath again, twenty five years later in 1848, when Martin Wilhelm von Mandt treated a cholera epidemic, and he also worked in the Military hospitals, again treating soldiers.

Tsar Nicholas I ordered the translation of Martin Wilhelm von Mandt‘s pamphlet on homeopathy translated into Russian, and he had it distributed to all his hospital management administrators and staff physicians. He said ‘We are crowning the work of Peter‘ (the Great). Tsar Nicholas I also sent his young scholars a to all parts of Europe, thus ensuring that Moscow University was greatly energised.

Tsar Nicholas I also sent his homeopaths to Paris to study directly under Samuel Hahnemann (Richard Haehl 1873 – 1932, Samuel Hahnemann: his life and work in two volumes, (The Homeopathic Publishing Company 1922 (German edition), 1926 (London Edition), republished by B Jain and Co (India) 1971). Volume 2, Page 181).

Tsar Nicholas I also established an Exemplar hospital with Martin Wilhelm von Mandt in post, and this hospital functioned from 1853 – 1856. Tsar Nicholas I personally influenced many doctors to practice homeopathy, and he carried his own personal case of homeopathic remedies with him everywhere (Dana Ullman, The Homeopathic Revolution: Why Famous People and Cultural Heroes Choose Homeopathy. (North Atlantic Books, 2007). Page 279).

Tsar Nicholas I, who was familiar with the “half-homeopathic” method of Martin Wilhelm von Mandt and often visited the Krasnosel’sk and Medved’ Military Hospitals, he both encouraged O F Scherring to continue with the treatment and regretted that such a fine “specific” treatment was not widely used in all Russian medical facilities….

When Grand Duke Constantine openly patronized homeopathy by keeping a homeopathic doctor as physician in ordinary, two of his brothers, Grand Duke Mikhail and Tsar Nicholas I, also became interested in the new teaching.

According to Carl Bojanus, to whom this story was told by Vasily Deriker, Tsar Nicholas even proposed in 1825 to O E Scherring who had been converted to homeopathy by Dr. Adam, and treated successfully an epidemic of eye inflammation with homeopathic medicines, although, as mentioned above, calling this method “specific”, “to promote this method of treatment decidedly”.

However, at that time the “promotion” of homeopathy under Nicholas I, even when called “specific treatment”, did not go through for O E Scherring’s fear to be accused by his medical superiors.

Several years later, Grand Duke Mikhail Pavlovich reportedly turned to the Tsar Nicholas I, asking him to support homeopathy. According to the Highest (i.e., Tsar’s) Order, the Medical Military Department was requested to conclude a contract with Christian Theodore Herrmann in February 1829.

Christian Theodore Herrmann pledged that for over a year he would treat homeopathically patients suffering from different diseases, like diarrhea, fevers of different origin, etc., in the military hospital which was to be established in the small town of Toulchin (Podolian province, Ukraine) for a reward of 12,000 rubles.

Moreover, if Christian Theodore Herrmann was successful in his treatment, his contract would be renewed. The contract provided independence in all the matters concerning Christian Theodore Herrmann’s covenanted activity, which granted him also freedom from customs’ restrictions, including the non opening of the box with homeopathic drugs at the customs.  Later this experiment was continued in St. Petersburg Military hospital.

The first cholera pandemic began in Russia in 1823 and reached its greatest intensity in 1830 and 1831. When the peak of the epidemic passed, more than a quarter of a million of the Tsar’s subjects had died, and the overall mortality among those stricken stood just below 50 per cent.

The cholera’s influence, if not its immediate effect, permeated the Russian system: recruiting for the army stopped, interior commerce came to a standstill, and quarantine regulations strait jacketed the nation. The people became restive; riots and rebellions broke out; and the international crises of 1830-31, found the Russian economy and military so hampered in their effectiveness that Chernyshev that the cholera ‘places us in such a situation as never before existed’.

Nicholas was not brought up to be the Emperor of Russia, as he had two elder brothers before him. As such, in 1825, when Tsar Alexander I suddenly died of typhus, Nicholas was caught between swearing allegiance to his second eldest brother Constantine Pavlovich and accepting the throne for himself.

The interregnum lasted until Constantine Pavlovich who was in Warsaw at that time confirmed his refusal. Additionally, in 25 December (13 Old Style) Nicholas issued the manifesto claiming his accession to the throne. That manifesto named 1 December as official date of his reign start.

During that confusion a plot was hatched by the military to overthrow Nicholas and to usurp power. This led to the Decembrist Revolt in 26 December (14 Old Style), 1825 where Nicholas was successful in suppressing the uprising.

Nicholas completely lacked his brothers’ spiritual and intellectual breadth; he saw his role simply as one paternal autocrat ruling his people by whatever means were necessary. Having experienced the trauma of the Decembrist Revolt, Nicholas I was determined to restrain Russian society. The Third Section of the Imperial Chancellery ran a huge network of spies and informers with the help of Gendarmes. The government exercised censorship and other controls over education, publishing, and all manifestations of public life.

In 1833 the minister of education, Sergey Uvarov, devised a program of “Autocracy, Orthodoxy, and Nationality” as the guiding principle of the regime. The people were to show loyalty to the unlimited authority of the Tsar, to the traditions of the Russian Orthodox Church, and, in a vague way, to the Russian nation. These principles led, broadly speaking, to repression in general and to suppression of non Russian nationalities and religions in particular. For example, the government suppressed the Greek Catholic Churches in Ukraine and Belarus in 1839. See also Cantonists.

Nicholas disliked serfdom and toyed with the idea of abolishing serfdom in Russia, but did not do so for practical reasons of state. He feared the landowners and believed they might turn against him, if he abolished serfdom. However, he did make some efforts to improve the lot of the state peasants (serfs owned by the government) with the help of the minister Pavel Kiselev.

During most of his reign he tried to increase his control over the landowners and other influential groups in Russia….

Nicholas died on 2 March 1855. The cause of his death is unclear though many believe he poisoned himself after learning of Russia’s defeat at Evpatoria during the Crimean War.

3 thoughts on “Tsar Nicholas I 1796 – 1855”

  1. Regarding the death of Nicholas 1855: An article in the “British Colonist (Toronto Canada) Jan 12, 1856 page 2 – Suicide by the Emperor Nicholas: At an inquiry held before Mr. Wakely, into the circumstances attending the death of a person who had suffered from an affection of the pulmonary organs, the disease to which the late Emperor of Russia’s death was attributed, the coroner in remarking upon the case, observed; “In the case of Emperor Nicholas, his death was put down to paralysis of the lungs and bronchitis, which according to the symptoms described, was known by us medical men to be impossible, and to have been stated only to deceive the public mind. The official documents describing the Emperors death stated that, at the last he took leave of his family with a firm voice, a proceeding physically impossible if he was suffering from the disease stated in the certificate of death. The belief, therefore, on the minds of the medical men in this country was that the Emperor was poisoned, and that is my own opinion, not, at the same time, that he was poisoned by those about him., but that he committed suicide.

  2. Hi Brian

    Mr. Wakely is of course the arch enemy of homeopathy, none other than Thomas Wakley of the Lancet
    http://sueyounghistories.com/archives/2008/08/09/dark-beginnings-for-the-lancet/

    This reference is aso quoted here
    Anon, Boston medical and surgical journal, Volume 53, Massachusetts Medical Society, New England Surgical Society (1856). Page 536.
    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7MIEAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA536&dq=wakley+tsar+nicholas&hl=en&sa=X&ei=LRdbT_KGE8Wr8AP37OyIDw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=wakley%20tsar%20nicholas&f=false

    I have to ask, how did Wakley get to know any of the circumstances surrounding the autopsy, body of a Russian Tsar? Did he visit Russia to inspect the body? Would he have been party to the autopsy report? Paralysis of the lungs and bronchitis is widely known in medicine, old and new. Its called consolidation of the lungs (http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/consolidation ‘… The process of becoming a firm solid mass, as in an infected lung when the alveoli are filled with exudate…’) Did Wakley want to spread vituperative propaganda? It must also be understood and taken into account that Tsar Nicholas as ‘the enemy’ in the Crimean War which had just ended, so this is most likely to be just spiteful gossip. Also, Wakley’s opposition to Tsar Nicholas 1 for his advocacy of homeopathy knew no bounds!! If he could put a vicious spin on the death of an enemy of England – well…

    Sue

  3. There is much controversy surrounding the death of Nicholas and inversely dearth information on it.

    There are a lot of agendas that muddy up the water.

    The Czars had many enemies, not the least of which were the ultimate assassins, the “Company of Loyola.

    The Jesuits had been expelled by Alexander I in 1820 and nearly every Czar since then had questions surrounding his death with Jesuit fingerprints particularly around the Communist Revolution and Nicholas II.

    I was hoping to get the skinny here but the comments were contentious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *